Down with detox

from
MT Editor
Matthew Gwyther

 
 

Features

  • Britain's Most Admired Companies 2008
 
 
 

Current Poll


  • What worries you more - falling house prices or rising fuel and food bills?




Search Blue Boomerang

 

 
Blueboomerang
 
 

Governance & CSR

Sponsored by:

Sponsored by: EAGA
 

What's Your Problem?

 
Date: 10-Jul-08   Jeremy Bullmore
My first managerial task is to fire an ex-colleague...

Q: I have recently been promoted to manager, and one of the first things I have to do is fire a colleague who has been underperforming for a long time. He has received warnings from the previous manager. I have never fired anyone before, and I have known this person for some years. Needless to say, I am uncomfortable about the task ahead. How should I handle it?

A: I do feel for you - it's a horrible moment. When I had to fire someone for the first time, I was so anxious to do it compassionately that I greatly overdid the tact and reassurance. As a result, he left the room happily, having totally failed to get what I'd been trying to say. A month later, I had to start all over again - this time rather more forcefully.

Procedural things first. Double-check with HR or your company lawyer that every obligation to do with verbal and written warnings has been observed: the last thing you'll need is a justifiable challenge to the legality of it. Be sure you know his precise contractual entitlement, when exactly you want him to leave and what his final settlement will be. Be prepared for any questions he might put to you about references.

Then consider having another person with you. I know it seems cold and impersonal, but it might be comforting for you and avoid any later dispute about what was actually said. Follow up the meeting by sending him a written summary.

Now a couple of stern warnings. Please don't be tempted to say how painful this conversation is for you. It is, of course; but don't expect sympathy from someone you're firing. And under no circumstances be tempted to imply that the decision wasn't yours, that it all stems from his previous manager, that you're only carrying out instructions from above ... and so on. Even if partly true, it sounds pretty cowardly. If you'd profoundly disagreed with the decision to fire him, you'd presumably have declined to do so.

And finally - though you don't have to carry thoughtfulness to the extreme that I once displayed - do all you can to let him retain some self-respect. Remember that he'll have to tell his family what's happened. There are different ways of telling the truth - and even underperformers deserve consideration.

 
 

Comments

Stephen Booth - 06-Nov-08

My gut feeling is that unless you have been given an instruction to fire or the person has been through a disciplinary procedure, don't. If you've been given an instruction then, so long as it's lawful, you have a fiduciary responsibility to follow it. If they've been through a disciplinary procedure and the outcome was dismissal then it's not really you that's firing them, you're just delivering the news. Other than that, your team, your call.

That's not to say the slate is totally clean for this employee. Make it clear to them, both verbally and in writing, what the issues are and how you expect them to deal with those issues. Then set a date by which you expect them to have hit that target. Also set up review dates and intermediary goals.

Meet with the employee on the review dates and check their progress and coach them towards the goals. Document every step.

If at the due date they have failed to achieve the goal you can move to the dismissal with paper work showing that you have done everything you reasonably could to correct what they have been dismissed for but they failed to live up to the reasonable goals they had been set.

The alternative is being the manager who got the company taken to tribunal by messing up a simple dismissal.

Stephen

To post comments please log in here